There Is a long line between the world of hackers and software companies. They would not like to another and each is working more and more diligently to ' beat ' and humiliate the other. It is a crime-world of e-peen and secrecy and the status quo was understood by both parties. That is, until Google got involved. Their approach is definitely unique and previously met with astounding success. Google offers all the money to find exploits for some time, most recently $ 20,000 to users in the competition of CanSecWest PWN2OWN at the Conference. How has this played? Well, for the past 3 years in the League, Chrome has come from unhacked.
It is a long-standing virtue that competition is healthy for any business is and while there is certainly competition these days in the corporate world of operating systems and browsers, there is a new breed of competition between Google and the hacking community. Chrome is the new target with the rose on her back for all the top hackers and for the right reasons. Their open-armed approach to finding bugs has so far more than $ 100,000 in payoffs netted. Due to the large company vs. enthusiast rivalry in a game instead of a war where prices are within the fame can always hacking and mainstream world as well as money, Google software only are on track to become the safest around by leaps and bounds.
This means that the chrome browser and OS are Unhackable? By all means no, there will always be holes and possible exploits. However, it means that users will get to take advantage of the benefits of the approach with more secure and stable software. As business and home users more and more aware of identity theft and data, Google has the ability to hit the ground running with the next public release of the Chrome OS and convert it into something special in the field of security. So this is what current and future users should look forward to for the Chrome OS? Time will tell, but here's hoping that the answer is Yes.
Google's approach of friendly Hacking: good idea or best idea?, 5.0 out of 5 based on 4 ratings
0 comments:
Post a Comment